| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Sophia Truthspeaker
Imperial Shipment
   |
Posted - 2009.06.10 14:20:00 -
[1]
Once again, thank you for the official post.
Sad to see someone not only betraying the trust within the game but completly breaking the game as well with RMT trading.
Actually I percieved Ricdic as the biggest liability of Ebank for a while now. If measures are taken to prevent future ... well whatever Ricdics role was in Ebank... to exploit Ebank the same way my level of trust towards Ebank will actually increase.
So two questions to Hexxx:
Will future people of Ebank hold the same amount of power as Ricdic? What are the measures to prevent this, if desired?
_________
The truth is out there |
Sophia Truthspeaker
Imperial Shipment
|
Posted - 2009.06.10 16:51:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Esharan
So its good he got banned and everything, but since when does CCP ban people for this sort of action? How did that break the EULA? It was my understanding that this was just a "risk" of investing...... part of the game ya know?
because there is also a rumor about him trading the stolen isk for real money. And participating in RMT is bannable.
If that rumor holds true, and I'll say it is a rumor until a GM verifies it (so basicly never, even if I don't have a doubt), I wonder how long back this started, as CCP isn't always the fastest with banning of RMT trader.
|
Sophia Truthspeaker
Imperial Shipment
|
Posted - 2009.06.10 17:15:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Block Ukx
Originally by: Kazzac Elentria
Originally by: Block Ukx
I'm guessing a few months after the Bank started.
Possibly, I would actually put it later. Most like before Shar left the ebank crew over disagreements about operations.
I have a feeling he suspected it.
A few months would already be worrisome... nearly two years is beyond that.. and hopefully beyond the investigation time of ccp, too...
My impression is and was that Shar left, because he thought Ricdic as a risk. Not in the 'grab und run' way, but in the 'lets pimp my CNR with 50 billions and fall asleep in a lvl 4' way... or if you so will in the 'lets loan 200 billion to someone without collateral' way.
Either way... that audit would have to be pretty detailed and with a fine sieve, just in case. |
Sophia Truthspeaker
Imperial Shipment
|
Posted - 2009.06.10 20:49:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Mme Pinkerton
Hexxx, your last sentence seems to imply that EBANK has been informed about Ricdic's RMT before CCP. I am not aware of any grace period given by CCP to people suspected of RMT (however, I cannot claim to have any first-hand experience of the way CCp treats breaches of EULA  ). Would you please clarify your statement?
If EBANK would have been informed of the RMT before CCP and have still conducted business with him (character transfer), this might - obviously - be of great interest to current investors.
This is my view of the matter, which can be as accurate as it can be false as I am not affiliated with Ebank except having a small amount of isk deposited there.
I'd guess the transfer was discussed and started before the RMT happened. Perhaps loosing control of Ebank also hastened or at least strenthend the motivation for the theft.
As such Ebank wouldn't have any prior notice of RMT. |
Sophia Truthspeaker
Imperial Shipment
|
Posted - 2009.06.11 13:34:00 -
[5]
Could someone from Ebank verify that the text posted by Ottozia is from Ricdic? There should be ample insider informations given, which would linken the text to at least an Ebank employee.
|
Sophia Truthspeaker
Imperial Shipment
|
Posted - 2009.06.11 13:47:00 -
[6]
Originally by: LaVista Vista
Originally by: Sophia Truthspeaker
Could someone from Ebank verify that the text posted by Ottozia is from Ricdic? There should be ample insider informations given, which would linken the text to at least an Ebank employee.
If it's not ricdic, then I be damned.
Great, thanks. If an (to me) unknown person posts such a message I'd like to know if we can take it as face value or not.
While I wasn't fond of Ricdic there wasn't a right choice, just the choice between two evils. I hope he will think of it as the lesser one.
_________
The truth is out there |
Sophia Truthspeaker
Imperial Shipment
|
Posted - 2009.06.11 14:13:00 -
[7]
Originally by: LeGlt
People seem to be ignoring or illigitimising Ottozia's posts on page 11 - I have just been speaking to Ricdic on MSN, not just as a corp mate but as a friend, and he has asked me to confirm that the posts by Ottozia are a correct and accurate record of events.
I didn't want to illigitimize Ottozia's post. I simply don't know him, have no idea, why Ricdic would send him his statement.
I imagine most of the MD readers don't have access to the Ebank internal data, so we had no way of telling if it was Ricdic speaking or someone claiming to be him. |
Sophia Truthspeaker
Imperial Shipment
|
Posted - 2009.06.11 23:52:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Lecherito
stuff
It's funny, ya know? The moment you open your mouth I find myself in any camp opposed to ye.
There are all kind of holes in your 'arguments' btw. But heh, you probably have to be a functional human being to understand it.
So lets get personal. If some guy walks up to you and forces you to decide to either get shot in a leg or in an arm what do you choose?
Any game works because there are rules that keep the game away from real life. Within the boundries of the game everything is okay and winning or loosing is okay because it is 'just' a game. The problem is, that in a prolonged game (like eve and other mmporgs) rl can muddle into it. And the 'rules' of rl are a bit muddier than those of any game. Somewhere between 'all for the game' and 'totally rl' we live. And the extrem cases are pretty sad... or annoying...
|
| |
|